Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Marketing Managers Salary: Pennsylvania vs Massachusetts

Marketing Managers earn a median of $142,000 in Pennsylvania and $192,480 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $50,480 (-26.2%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$142,000
Pennsylvania median
$145,534 after COL
$192,480
Massachusetts median
$182,002 after COL
-26.2%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-20.0%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $50,480 more per year than Pennsylvania for marketing managers, a gap of +26.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $36,469 of extra purchasing power (+20.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$142,000
Mean salary
$155,840
Employment
12,700
Location quotient
0.85
Jobs per 1,000
2.1
COL-adjusted median
$145,534
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Pennsylvania →

Marketing Managers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$192,480
Mean salary
$200,400
Employment
13,520
Location quotient
1.49
Jobs per 1,000
3.7
COL-adjusted median
$182,002
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.