Skip to content
uswages .org

Materials Engineers Salary: New Mexico vs California

Materials Engineers earn a median of $165,600 in New Mexico and $128,470 in California. That is a nominal gap of $37,130 (+28.9%), with New Mexico paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$165,600
New Mexico median
$179,586 after COL
$128,470
California median
$116,031 after COL
+28.9%
Nominal gap
New Mexico leads
+54.8%
Adjusted gap
New Mexico leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Mexico pays $37,130 more per year than California for materials engineers, a gap of +28.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Mexico still comes out ahead, with roughly $63,555 of extra purchasing power (+54.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for materials engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Materials Engineers

New Mexico

Median salary
$165,600
Mean salary
$173,000
Employment
450
Location quotient
3.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$179,586
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Engineers page for New Mexico →

Materials Engineers

California

Median salary
$128,470
Mean salary
$131,090
Employment
3,020
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$116,031
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Engineers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into materials engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.