Skip to content
uswages .org

Materials Scientists Salary: Indiana vs California

Materials Scientists earn a median of $130,540 in Indiana and $177,030 in California. That is a nominal gap of $46,490 (-26.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$130,540
Indiana median
$139,871 after COL
$177,030
California median
$159,890 after COL
-26.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
-12.5%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $46,490 more per year than Indiana for materials scientists, a gap of +26.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,019 of extra purchasing power (+12.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for materials scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Materials Scientists

Indiana

Median salary
$130,540
Mean salary
$127,210
Employment
320
Location quotient
1.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$139,871
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Scientists page for Indiana →

Materials Scientists

California

Median salary
$177,030
Mean salary
$189,460
Employment
1,030
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$159,890
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Materials Scientists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into materials scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.