Skip to content
uswages .org

Medical Assistants Salary: California vs Washington

Medical Assistants earn a median of $49,660 in California and $59,290 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $9,630 (-16.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,660
California median
$44,852 after COL
$59,290
Washington median
$55,404 after COL
-16.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-19.0%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $9,630 more per year than California for medical assistants, a gap of +16.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,553 of extra purchasing power (+19.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for medical assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Medical Assistants

California

Median salary
$49,660
Mean salary
$55,100
Employment
117,060
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
6.4
COL-adjusted median
$44,852
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Assistants page for California →

Medical Assistants

Washington

Median salary
$59,290
Mean salary
$58,590
Employment
19,500
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
5.5
COL-adjusted median
$55,404
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Assistants page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into medical assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.