Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists Salary: Texas vs Maine

Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists earn a median of $78,410 in Texas and $107,950 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $29,540 (-27.4%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$78,410
Texas median
$80,788 after COL
$107,950
Maine median
$111,231 after COL
-27.4%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
-27.4%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $29,540 more per year than Texas for medical scientists, except epidemiologists, a gap of +27.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $30,444 of extra purchasing power (+27.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for medical scientists, except epidemiologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists

Texas

Median salary
$78,410
Mean salary
$90,150
Employment
11,450
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$80,788
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists page for Texas →

Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists

Maine

Median salary
$107,950
Mean salary
$127,100
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$111,231
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Scientists, Except Epidemiologists page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into medical scientists, except epidemiologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.