Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Medical Transcriptionists Salary: Oklahoma vs Connecticut

Medical Transcriptionists earn a median of $28,920 in Oklahoma and $46,800 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $17,880 (-38.2%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$28,920
Oklahoma median
$32,922 after COL
$46,800
Connecticut median
$45,169 after COL
-38.2%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-27.1%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $17,880 more per year than Oklahoma for medical transcriptionists, a gap of +38.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,247 of extra purchasing power (+27.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for medical transcriptionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Medical Transcriptionists

Oklahoma

Median salary
$28,920
Mean salary
$30,610
Employment
570
Location quotient
1.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$32,922
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Transcriptionists page for Oklahoma →

Medical Transcriptionists

Connecticut

Median salary
$46,800
Mean salary
$47,700
Employment
540
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$45,169
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Medical Transcriptionists page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into medical transcriptionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.