Skip to content
uswages .org

Model Makers, Metal And Plastic Salary: Texas vs Illinois

Model Makers, Metal And Plastic earn a median of $65,920 in Texas and $68,890 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $2,970 (-4.3%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,920
Texas median
$67,919 after COL
$68,890
Illinois median
$68,919 after COL
-4.3%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-1.5%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $2,970 more per year than Texas for model makers, metal and plastic, a gap of +4.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,000 of extra purchasing power (+1.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for model makers, metal and plastic in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Model Makers, Metal And Plastic

Texas

Median salary
$65,920
Mean salary
$74,440
Employment
230
Location quotient
0.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$67,919
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Model Makers, Metal And Plastic page for Texas →

Model Makers, Metal And Plastic

Illinois

Median salary
$68,890
Mean salary
$60,260
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$68,919
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Model Makers, Metal And Plastic page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into model makers, metal and plastic from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.