Skip to content
uswages .org

Motion Picture Projectionists Salary: Michigan vs Arizona

Motion Picture Projectionists earn a median of $37,590 in Michigan and $32,890 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $4,700 (+14.3%), with Michigan paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,590
Michigan median
$39,068 after COL
$32,890
Arizona median
$32,669 after COL
+14.3%
Nominal gap
Michigan leads
+19.6%
Adjusted gap
Michigan leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Michigan pays $4,700 more per year than Arizona for motion picture projectionists, a gap of +14.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Michigan still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,399 of extra purchasing power (+19.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for motion picture projectionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Motion Picture Projectionists

Michigan

Median salary
$37,590
Mean salary
$40,190
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$39,068
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motion Picture Projectionists page for Michigan →

Motion Picture Projectionists

Arizona

Median salary
$32,890
Mean salary
$38,320
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$32,669
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motion Picture Projectionists page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into motion picture projectionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.