Skip to content
uswages .org

Motion Picture Projectionists Salary: Washington vs California

Motion Picture Projectionists earn a median of $39,070 in Washington and $74,840 in California. That is a nominal gap of $35,770 (-47.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$39,070
Washington median
$36,510 after COL
$74,840
California median
$67,594 after COL
-47.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
-46.0%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $35,770 more per year than Washington for motion picture projectionists, a gap of +47.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $31,084 of extra purchasing power (+46.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for motion picture projectionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Motion Picture Projectionists

Washington

Median salary
$39,070
Mean salary
$44,580
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.64
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$36,510
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motion Picture Projectionists page for Washington →

Motion Picture Projectionists

California

Median salary
$74,840
Mean salary
$78,050
Employment
190
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$67,594
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motion Picture Projectionists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into motion picture projectionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.