Skip to content
uswages .org

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other Salary: Utah vs Alaska

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other earn a median of $56,140 in Utah and $74,710 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $18,570 (-24.9%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$56,140
Utah median
$56,785 after COL
$74,710
Alaska median
$72,988 after COL
-24.9%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-22.2%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $18,570 more per year than Utah for motor vehicle operators, all other, a gap of +24.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,203 of extra purchasing power (+22.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for motor vehicle operators, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other

Utah

Median salary
$56,140
Mean salary
$58,130
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$56,785
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other page for Utah →

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other

Alaska

Median salary
$74,710
Mean salary
$64,970
Employment
100
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$72,988
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into motor vehicle operators, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.