Skip to content
uswages .org

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other Salary: Washington vs Oklahoma

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other earn a median of $59,730 in Washington and $57,550 in Oklahoma. That is a nominal gap of $2,180 (+3.8%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$59,730
Washington median
$55,816 after COL
$57,550
Oklahoma median
$65,515 after COL
+3.8%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-14.8%
Adjusted gap
Oklahoma leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $2,180 more per year than Oklahoma for motor vehicle operators, all other, a gap of +3.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oklahoma actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $9,699 more in national-price-level terms (a +14.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for motor vehicle operators, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other

Washington

Median salary
$59,730
Mean salary
$60,560
Employment
310
Location quotient
0.29
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$55,816
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other page for Washington →

Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other

Oklahoma

Median salary
$57,550
Mean salary
$51,090
Employment
180
Location quotient
0.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$65,515
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Motor Vehicle Operators, All Other page for Oklahoma →

Related pages

Keep digging into motor vehicle operators, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.