Skip to content
uswages .org

Music Directors And Composers Salary: Connecticut vs Colorado

Music Directors And Composers earn a median of $77,070 in Connecticut and $88,460 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $11,390 (-12.9%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,070
Connecticut median
$74,385 after COL
$88,460
Colorado median
$85,840 after COL
-12.9%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
-13.3%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $11,390 more per year than Connecticut for music directors and composers, a gap of +12.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,455 of extra purchasing power (+13.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for music directors and composers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Music Directors And Composers

Connecticut

Median salary
$77,070
Mean salary
$105,300
Employment
120
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$74,385
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Connecticut →

Music Directors And Composers

Colorado

Median salary
$88,460
Mean salary
$92,810
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$85,840
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into music directors and composers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.