Skip to content
uswages .org

Music Directors And Composers Salary: Texas vs New York

Music Directors And Composers earn a median of $65,570 in Texas and $82,930 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $17,360 (-20.9%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,570
Texas median
$67,558 after COL
$82,930
New York median
$76,843 after COL
-20.9%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-12.1%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $17,360 more per year than Texas for music directors and composers, a gap of +20.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,285 of extra purchasing power (+12.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for music directors and composers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Music Directors And Composers

Texas

Median salary
$65,570
Mean salary
$85,750
Employment
480
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$67,558
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Texas →

Music Directors And Composers

New York

Median salary
$82,930
Mean salary
$105,520
Employment
2,370
Location quotient
3.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$76,843
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into music directors and composers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.