Skip to content
uswages .org

Music Directors And Composers Salary: Utah vs California

Music Directors And Composers earn a median of $82,570 in Utah and $93,090 in California. That is a nominal gap of $10,520 (-11.3%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,570
Utah median
$83,519 after COL
$93,090
California median
$84,077 after COL
-11.3%
Nominal gap
California leads
-0.7%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $10,520 more per year than Utah for music directors and composers, a gap of +11.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $558 of extra purchasing power (+0.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for music directors and composers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Music Directors And Composers

Utah

Median salary
$82,570
Mean salary
$83,970
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.06
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$83,519
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for Utah →

Music Directors And Composers

California

Median salary
$93,090
Mean salary
$108,530
Employment
2,510
Location quotient
1.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$84,077
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Music Directors And Composers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into music directors and composers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.