Skip to content
uswages .org

Natural Sciences Managers Salary: Massachusetts vs Connecticut

Natural Sciences Managers earn a median of $267,290 in Massachusetts and $210,670 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $56,620 (+26.9%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$267,290
Massachusetts median
$252,740 after COL
$210,670
Connecticut median
$203,330 after COL
+26.9%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+24.3%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $56,620 more per year than Connecticut for natural sciences managers, a gap of +26.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $49,410 of extra purchasing power (+24.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for natural sciences managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Natural Sciences Managers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$267,290
Mean salary
$257,010
Employment
10,590
Location quotient
4.16
Jobs per 1,000
2.9
COL-adjusted median
$252,740
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Natural Sciences Managers page for Massachusetts →

Natural Sciences Managers

Connecticut

Median salary
$210,670
Mean salary
$217,800
Employment
1,190
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$203,330
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Natural Sciences Managers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into natural sciences managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.