Skip to content
uswages .org

Neurologists Salary: California vs Alaska

Neurologists earn a median of $357,080 in California and $354,760 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $2,320 (+0.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$357,080
California median
$322,507 after COL
$354,760
Alaska median
$346,584 after COL
+0.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
-6.9%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $2,320 more per year than Alaska for neurologists, a gap of +0.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alaska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $24,077 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for neurologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Neurologists

California

Median salary
$357,080
Mean salary
$306,860
Employment
1,090
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$322,507
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Neurologists page for California →

Neurologists

Alaska

Median salary
$354,760
Mean salary
$335,530
Employment
100
Location quotient
4.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$346,584
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Neurologists page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into neurologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.