Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Nuclear Engineers Salary: Nebraska vs Minnesota

Nuclear Engineers earn a median of $149,280 in Nebraska and $150,260 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $980 (-0.7%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$149,280
Nebraska median
$165,677 after COL
$150,260
Minnesota median
$152,361 after COL
-0.7%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
+8.7%
Adjusted gap
Nebraska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $980 more per year than Nebraska for nuclear engineers, a gap of +0.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nebraska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $13,316 more in national-price-level terms (a +8.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nuclear engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nuclear Engineers

Nebraska

Median salary
$149,280
Mean salary
$145,680
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$165,677
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nuclear Engineers page for Nebraska →

Nuclear Engineers

Minnesota

Median salary
$150,260
Mean salary
$147,850
Employment
190
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$152,361
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nuclear Engineers page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into nuclear engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.