Skip to content
uswages .org

Nuclear Medicine Technologists Salary: California vs New Jersey

Nuclear Medicine Technologists earn a median of $162,380 in California and $124,280 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $38,100 (+30.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$162,380
California median
$146,658 after COL
$124,280
New Jersey median
$114,223 after COL
+30.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
+28.4%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $38,100 more per year than New Jersey for nuclear medicine technologists, a gap of +30.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,436 of extra purchasing power (+28.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nuclear medicine technologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nuclear Medicine Technologists

California

Median salary
$162,380
Mean salary
$160,110
Employment
1,500
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$146,658
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nuclear Medicine Technologists page for California →

Nuclear Medicine Technologists

New Jersey

Median salary
$124,280
Mean salary
$122,290
Employment
540
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$114,223
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nuclear Medicine Technologists page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into nuclear medicine technologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.