Skip to content
uswages .org

Nuclear Technicians Salary: Massachusetts vs Texas

Nuclear Technicians earn a median of $113,390 in Massachusetts and $124,060 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $10,670 (-8.6%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$113,390
Massachusetts median
$107,217 after COL
$124,060
Texas median
$127,822 after COL
-8.6%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-16.1%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $10,670 more per year than Massachusetts for nuclear technicians, a gap of +8.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $20,604 of extra purchasing power (+16.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nuclear technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nuclear Technicians

Massachusetts

Median salary
$113,390
Mean salary
$103,050
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$107,217
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nuclear Technicians page for Massachusetts →

Nuclear Technicians

Texas

Median salary
$124,060
Mean salary
$116,620
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$127,822
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nuclear Technicians page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into nuclear technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.