Skip to content
uswages .org

Nurse Anesthetists Salary: Alaska vs Illinois

Nurse Anesthetists earn a median of $341,210 in Alaska and $286,830 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $54,380 (+19.0%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$341,210
Alaska median
$333,346 after COL
$286,830
Illinois median
$286,951 after COL
+19.0%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+16.2%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $54,380 more per year than Illinois for nurse anesthetists, a gap of +19.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $46,396 of extra purchasing power (+16.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse anesthetists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Anesthetists

Alaska

Median salary
$341,210
Mean salary
$311,110
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$333,346
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Anesthetists page for Alaska →

Nurse Anesthetists

Illinois

Median salary
$286,830
Mean salary
$251,600
Employment
1,140
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$286,951
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Anesthetists page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse anesthetists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.