Skip to content
uswages .org

Nurse Anesthetists Salary: Kansas vs California

Nurse Anesthetists earn a median of $212,090 in Kansas and $292,410 in California. That is a nominal gap of $80,320 (-27.5%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$212,090
Kansas median
$235,478 after COL
$292,410
California median
$264,099 after COL
-27.5%
Nominal gap
California leads
-10.8%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $80,320 more per year than Kansas for nurse anesthetists, a gap of +27.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,621 of extra purchasing power (+10.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse anesthetists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Anesthetists

Kansas

Median salary
$212,090
Mean salary
$206,320
Employment
910
Location quotient
1.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$235,478
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Anesthetists page for Kansas →

Nurse Anesthetists

California

Median salary
$292,410
Mean salary
$283,780
Employment
2,230
Location quotient
0.37
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$264,099
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Anesthetists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse anesthetists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.