Skip to content
uswages .org

Nurse Anesthetists Salary: New Hampshire vs Alaska

Nurse Anesthetists earn a median of $275,980 in New Hampshire and $341,210 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $65,230 (-19.1%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$275,980
New Hampshire median
$264,945 after COL
$341,210
Alaska median
$333,346 after COL
-19.1%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-20.5%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $65,230 more per year than New Hampshire for nurse anesthetists, a gap of +19.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $68,401 of extra purchasing power (+20.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse anesthetists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Anesthetists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$275,980
Mean salary
$277,740
Employment
490
Location quotient
2.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$264,945
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Anesthetists page for New Hampshire →

Nurse Anesthetists

Alaska

Median salary
$341,210
Mean salary
$311,110
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$333,346
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Anesthetists page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse anesthetists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.