Skip to content
uswages .org

Nurse Midwives Salary: Vermont vs California

Nurse Midwives earn a median of $151,030 in Vermont and $203,840 in California. That is a nominal gap of $52,810 (-25.9%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$151,030
Vermont median
$154,178 after COL
$203,840
California median
$184,104 after COL
-25.9%
Nominal gap
California leads
-16.3%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $52,810 more per year than Vermont for nurse midwives, a gap of +25.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $29,926 of extra purchasing power (+16.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nurse midwives in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nurse Midwives

Vermont

Median salary
$151,030
Mean salary
$148,100
Employment
60
Location quotient
4.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$154,178
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Midwives page for Vermont →

Nurse Midwives

California

Median salary
$203,840
Mean salary
$194,730
Employment
870
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$184,104
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nurse Midwives page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into nurse midwives from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.