Skip to content
uswages .org

Nursing Assistants Salary: Vermont vs California

Nursing Assistants earn a median of $47,130 in Vermont and $47,630 in California. That is a nominal gap of $500 (-1.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,130
Vermont median
$48,112 after COL
$47,630
California median
$43,018 after COL
-1.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
+11.8%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $500 more per year than Vermont for nursing assistants, a gap of +1.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $5,094 more in national-price-level terms (a +11.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nursing assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nursing Assistants

Vermont

Median salary
$47,130
Mean salary
$46,850
Employment
3,030
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
10.0
COL-adjusted median
$48,112
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nursing Assistants page for Vermont →

Nursing Assistants

California

Median salary
$47,630
Mean salary
$50,190
Employment
110,060
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
6.0
COL-adjusted median
$43,018
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nursing Assistants page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into nursing assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.