Skip to content
uswages .org

Nursing Assistants Salary: Washington vs New Hampshire

Nursing Assistants earn a median of $49,180 in Washington and $47,870 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $1,310 (+2.7%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,180
Washington median
$45,957 after COL
$47,870
New Hampshire median
$45,956 after COL
+2.7%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+0.0%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $1,310 more per year than New Hampshire for nursing assistants, a gap of +2.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $1 of extra purchasing power (+0.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for nursing assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Nursing Assistants

Washington

Median salary
$49,180
Mean salary
$52,230
Employment
30,270
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
8.5
COL-adjusted median
$45,957
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nursing Assistants page for Washington →

Nursing Assistants

New Hampshire

Median salary
$47,870
Mean salary
$49,290
Employment
7,810
Location quotient
1.23
Jobs per 1,000
11.4
COL-adjusted median
$45,956
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Nursing Assistants page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into nursing assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.