Skip to content
uswages .org

Obstetricians And Gynecologists Salary: Vermont vs Oregon

Obstetricians And Gynecologists earn a median of $418,760 in Vermont and $395,340 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $23,420 (+5.9%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$418,760
Vermont median
$427,489 after COL
$395,340
Oregon median
$382,485 after COL
+5.9%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
+11.8%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $23,420 more per year than Oregon for obstetricians and gynecologists, a gap of +5.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $45,005 of extra purchasing power (+11.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for obstetricians and gynecologists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Obstetricians And Gynecologists

Vermont

Median salary
$418,760
Mean salary
$376,670
Employment
90
Location quotient
2.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$427,489
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Obstetricians And Gynecologists page for Vermont →

Obstetricians And Gynecologists

Oregon

Median salary
$395,340
Mean salary
$366,460
Employment
270
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$382,485
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Obstetricians And Gynecologists page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into obstetricians and gynecologists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.