Skip to content
uswages .org

Occupational Therapy Assistants Salary: Washington vs Arkansas

Occupational Therapy Assistants earn a median of $77,590 in Washington and $78,940 in Arkansas. That is a nominal gap of $1,350 (-1.7%), with Arkansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,590
Washington median
$72,505 after COL
$78,940
Arkansas median
$90,801 after COL
-1.7%
Nominal gap
Arkansas leads
-20.1%
Adjusted gap
Arkansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arkansas pays $1,350 more per year than Washington for occupational therapy assistants, a gap of +1.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arkansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,296 of extra purchasing power (+20.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for occupational therapy assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Occupational Therapy Assistants

Washington

Median salary
$77,590
Mean salary
$76,310
Employment
720
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$72,505
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Occupational Therapy Assistants page for Washington →

Occupational Therapy Assistants

Arkansas

Median salary
$78,940
Mean salary
$76,900
Employment
730
Location quotient
1.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$90,801
Regional Price Parity
86.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Occupational Therapy Assistants page for Arkansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into occupational therapy assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.