Skip to content
uswages .org

Operations Research Analysts Salary: California vs Ohio

Operations Research Analysts earn a median of $102,100 in California and $103,620 in Ohio. That is a nominal gap of $1,520 (-1.5%), with Ohio paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$102,100
California median
$92,215 after COL
$103,620
Ohio median
$111,691 after COL
-1.5%
Nominal gap
Ohio leads
-17.4%
Adjusted gap
Ohio leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Ohio pays $1,520 more per year than California for operations research analysts, a gap of +1.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Ohio still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,476 of extra purchasing power (+17.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for operations research analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Operations Research Analysts

California

Median salary
$102,100
Mean salary
$110,860
Employment
10,620
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$92,215
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Operations Research Analysts page for California →

Operations Research Analysts

Ohio

Median salary
$103,620
Mean salary
$101,050
Employment
2,600
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$111,691
Regional Price Parity
92.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Operations Research Analysts page for Ohio →

Related pages

Keep digging into operations research analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.