Skip to content
uswages .org

Ophthalmic Medical Technicians Salary: California vs Vermont

Ophthalmic Medical Technicians earn a median of $54,490 in California and $50,090 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $4,400 (+8.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,490
California median
$49,214 after COL
$50,090
Vermont median
$51,134 after COL
+8.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
-3.8%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $4,400 more per year than Vermont for ophthalmic medical technicians, a gap of +8.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,920 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for ophthalmic medical technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Ophthalmic Medical Technicians

California

Median salary
$54,490
Mean salary
$63,030
Employment
2,500
Location quotient
0.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$49,214
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Ophthalmic Medical Technicians page for California →

Ophthalmic Medical Technicians

Vermont

Median salary
$50,090
Mean salary
$53,720
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$51,134
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Ophthalmic Medical Technicians page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into ophthalmic medical technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.