Skip to content
uswages .org

Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric Salary: California vs Florida

Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric earn a median of $400,150 in California and $399,440 in Florida. That is a nominal gap of $710 (+0.2%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$400,150
California median
$361,407 after COL
$399,440
Florida median
$386,253 after COL
+0.2%
Nominal gap
California leads
-6.4%
Adjusted gap
Florida leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $710 more per year than Florida for ophthalmologists, except pediatric, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Florida actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $24,846 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.4% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for ophthalmologists, except pediatric in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric

California

Median salary
$400,150
Mean salary
$347,690
Employment
820
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$361,407
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric page for California →

Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric

Florida

Median salary
$399,440
Mean salary
$391,060
Employment
580
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$386,253
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric page for Florida →

Related pages

Keep digging into ophthalmologists, except pediatric from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.