Skip to content
uswages .org

Optometrists Salary: North Carolina vs Minnesota

Optometrists earn a median of $161,560 in North Carolina and $158,700 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $2,860 (+1.8%), with North Carolina paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$161,560
North Carolina median
$171,278 after COL
$158,700
Minnesota median
$160,919 after COL
+1.8%
Nominal gap
North Carolina leads
+6.4%
Adjusted gap
North Carolina leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Carolina pays $2,860 more per year than Minnesota for optometrists, a gap of +1.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Carolina still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,359 of extra purchasing power (+6.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for optometrists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Optometrists

North Carolina

Median salary
$161,560
Mean salary
$161,030
Employment
1,140
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$171,278
Regional Price Parity
94.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Optometrists page for North Carolina →

Optometrists

Minnesota

Median salary
$158,700
Mean salary
$151,450
Employment
710
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$160,919
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Optometrists page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into optometrists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.