Skip to content
uswages .org

Orthotists And Prosthetists Salary: California vs Rhode Island

Orthotists And Prosthetists earn a median of $91,820 in California and $93,350 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $1,530 (-1.6%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$91,820
California median
$82,930 after COL
$93,350
Rhode Island median
$91,269 after COL
-1.6%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-9.1%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $1,530 more per year than California for orthotists and prosthetists, a gap of +1.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,339 of extra purchasing power (+9.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for orthotists and prosthetists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Orthotists And Prosthetists

California

Median salary
$91,820
Mean salary
$93,030
Employment
1,050
Location quotient
0.95
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$82,930
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Orthotists And Prosthetists page for California →

Orthotists And Prosthetists

Rhode Island

Median salary
$93,350
Mean salary
$89,170
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$91,269
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Orthotists And Prosthetists page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into orthotists and prosthetists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.