Skip to content
uswages .org

Packers And Packagers, Hand Salary: Kansas vs Alaska

Packers And Packagers, Hand earn a median of $44,460 in Kansas and $41,670 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $2,790 (+6.7%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,460
Kansas median
$49,363 after COL
$41,670
Alaska median
$40,710 after COL
+6.7%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
+21.3%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $2,790 more per year than Alaska for packers and packagers, hand, a gap of +6.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,653 of extra purchasing power (+21.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for packers and packagers, hand in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Packers And Packagers, Hand

Kansas

Median salary
$44,460
Mean salary
$41,330
Employment
9,900
Location quotient
1.91
Jobs per 1,000
6.9
COL-adjusted median
$49,363
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Packers And Packagers, Hand page for Kansas →

Packers And Packagers, Hand

Alaska

Median salary
$41,670
Mean salary
$42,420
Employment
560
Location quotient
0.48
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$40,710
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Packers And Packagers, Hand page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into packers and packagers, hand from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.