Skip to content
uswages .org

Paperhangers Salary: Indiana vs California

Paperhangers earn a median of $54,810 in Indiana and $62,790 in California. That is a nominal gap of $7,980 (-12.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,810
Indiana median
$58,728 after COL
$62,790
California median
$56,711 after COL
-12.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
+3.6%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $7,980 more per year than Indiana for paperhangers, a gap of +12.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Indiana actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,017 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for paperhangers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Paperhangers

Indiana

Median salary
$54,810
Mean salary
$51,530
Employment
70
Location quotient
2.04
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$58,728
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Paperhangers page for Indiana →

Paperhangers

California

Median salary
$62,790
Mean salary
$70,790
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$56,711
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Paperhangers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into paperhangers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.