Skip to content
uswages .org

Parking Attendants Salary: Colorado vs District of Columbia

Parking Attendants earn a median of $39,330 in Colorado and $37,220 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $2,110 (+5.7%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$39,330
Colorado median
$38,165 after COL
$37,220
District of Columbia median
$33,867 after COL
+5.7%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
+12.7%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $2,110 more per year than District of Columbia for parking attendants, a gap of +5.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,298 of extra purchasing power (+12.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Attendants

Colorado

Median salary
$39,330
Mean salary
$41,330
Employment
1,390
Location quotient
0.55
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$38,165
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Attendants page for Colorado →

Parking Attendants

District of Columbia

Median salary
$37,220
Mean salary
$38,010
Employment
1,900
Location quotient
3.06
Jobs per 1,000
2.7
COL-adjusted median
$33,867
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Attendants page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.