Skip to content
uswages .org

Parking Enforcement Workers Salary: Massachusetts vs Nevada

Parking Enforcement Workers earn a median of $51,980 in Massachusetts and $55,040 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $3,060 (-5.6%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$51,980
Massachusetts median
$49,150 after COL
$55,040
Nevada median
$55,052 after COL
-5.6%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-10.7%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $3,060 more per year than Massachusetts for parking enforcement workers, a gap of +5.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,901 of extra purchasing power (+10.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking enforcement workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Enforcement Workers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$51,980
Mean salary
$53,980
Employment
300
Location quotient
1.44
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$49,150
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Massachusetts →

Parking Enforcement Workers

Nevada

Median salary
$55,040
Mean salary
$61,390
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$55,052
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking enforcement workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.