Skip to content
uswages .org

Parking Enforcement Workers Salary: Oregon vs California

Parking Enforcement Workers earn a median of $59,810 in Oregon and $62,280 in California. That is a nominal gap of $2,470 (-4.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$59,810
Oregon median
$57,865 after COL
$62,280
California median
$56,250 after COL
-4.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
+2.9%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $2,470 more per year than Oregon for parking enforcement workers, a gap of +4.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,615 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking enforcement workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Enforcement Workers

Oregon

Median salary
$59,810
Mean salary
$62,160
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$57,865
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Oregon →

Parking Enforcement Workers

California

Median salary
$62,280
Mean salary
$64,190
Employment
1,710
Location quotient
1.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$56,250
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking enforcement workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.