Skip to content
uswages .org

Parking Enforcement Workers Salary: Utah vs California

Parking Enforcement Workers earn a median of $52,670 in Utah and $62,280 in California. That is a nominal gap of $9,610 (-15.4%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$52,670
Utah median
$53,275 after COL
$62,280
California median
$56,250 after COL
-15.4%
Nominal gap
California leads
-5.3%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $9,610 more per year than Utah for parking enforcement workers, a gap of +15.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,975 of extra purchasing power (+5.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking enforcement workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Enforcement Workers

Utah

Median salary
$52,670
Mean salary
$48,830
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$53,275
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Utah →

Parking Enforcement Workers

California

Median salary
$62,280
Mean salary
$64,190
Employment
1,710
Location quotient
1.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$56,250
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking enforcement workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.