Skip to content
uswages .org

Parking Enforcement Workers Salary: Wisconsin vs Massachusetts

Parking Enforcement Workers earn a median of $49,060 in Wisconsin and $51,980 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $2,920 (-5.6%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,060
Wisconsin median
$52,139 after COL
$51,980
Massachusetts median
$49,150 after COL
-5.6%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+6.1%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $2,920 more per year than Wisconsin for parking enforcement workers, a gap of +5.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wisconsin actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,988 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for parking enforcement workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Parking Enforcement Workers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$49,060
Mean salary
$51,680
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,139
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Wisconsin →

Parking Enforcement Workers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$51,980
Mean salary
$53,980
Employment
300
Location quotient
1.44
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$49,150
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Parking Enforcement Workers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into parking enforcement workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.