Skip to content
uswages .org

Passenger Attendants Salary: Alaska vs Kentucky

Passenger Attendants earn a median of $54,290 in Alaska and $44,810 in Kentucky. That is a nominal gap of $9,480 (+21.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,290
Alaska median
$53,039 after COL
$44,810
Kentucky median
$49,701 after COL
+21.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+6.7%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $9,480 more per year than Kentucky for passenger attendants, a gap of +21.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,338 of extra purchasing power (+6.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for passenger attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Passenger Attendants

Alaska

Median salary
$54,290
Mean salary
$52,800
Employment
220
Location quotient
3.94
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$53,039
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Passenger Attendants page for Alaska →

Passenger Attendants

Kentucky

Median salary
$44,810
Mean salary
$42,950
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$49,701
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Passenger Attendants page for Kentucky →

Related pages

Keep digging into passenger attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.