Skip to content
uswages .org

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic Salary: Washington vs Indiana

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic earn a median of $59,800 in Washington and $54,740 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $5,060 (+9.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$59,800
Washington median
$55,881 after COL
$54,740
Indiana median
$58,653 after COL
+9.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-4.7%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $5,060 more per year than Indiana for patternmakers, metal and plastic, a gap of +9.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Indiana actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,772 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for patternmakers, metal and plastic in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic

Washington

Median salary
$59,800
Mean salary
$61,410
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$55,881
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic page for Washington →

Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic

Indiana

Median salary
$54,740
Mean salary
$57,210
Employment
80
Location quotient
2.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$58,653
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Patternmakers, Metal And Plastic page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into patternmakers, metal and plastic from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.