Skip to content
uswages .org

Payroll And Timekeeping Clerks Salary: Washington vs Massachusetts

Payroll And Timekeeping Clerks earn a median of $64,560 in Washington and $63,670 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $890 (+1.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$64,560
Washington median
$60,329 after COL
$63,670
Massachusetts median
$60,204 after COL
+1.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+0.2%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $890 more per year than Massachusetts for payroll and timekeeping clerks, a gap of +1.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $125 of extra purchasing power (+0.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for payroll and timekeeping clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Payroll And Timekeeping Clerks

Washington

Median salary
$64,560
Mean salary
$67,810
Employment
3,560
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$60,329
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Payroll And Timekeeping Clerks page for Washington →

Payroll And Timekeeping Clerks

Massachusetts

Median salary
$63,670
Mean salary
$66,810
Employment
3,280
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$60,204
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Payroll And Timekeeping Clerks page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into payroll and timekeeping clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.