Skip to content
uswages .org

Pediatricians, General Salary: North Dakota vs Montana

Pediatricians, General earn a median of $234,950 in North Dakota and $273,260 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $38,310 (-14.0%), with Montana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$234,950
North Dakota median
$264,110 after COL
$273,260
Montana median
$288,721 after COL
-14.0%
Nominal gap
Montana leads
-8.5%
Adjusted gap
Montana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Montana pays $38,310 more per year than North Dakota for pediatricians, general, a gap of +14.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Montana still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,611 of extra purchasing power (+8.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for pediatricians, general in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Pediatricians, General

North Dakota

Median salary
$234,950
Mean salary
$242,000
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$264,110
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pediatricians, General page for North Dakota →

Pediatricians, General

Montana

Median salary
$273,260
Mean salary
$284,770
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$288,721
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Pediatricians, General page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into pediatricians, general from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.