Skip to content
uswages .org

Personal Financial Advisors Salary: Massachusetts vs Connecticut

Personal Financial Advisors earn a median of $125,670 in Massachusetts and $129,720 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $4,050 (-3.1%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$125,670
Massachusetts median
$118,829 after COL
$129,720
Connecticut median
$125,200 after COL
-3.1%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-5.1%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $4,050 more per year than Massachusetts for personal financial advisors, a gap of +3.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,371 of extra purchasing power (+5.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for personal financial advisors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Personal Financial Advisors

Massachusetts

Median salary
$125,670
Mean salary
$172,430
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$118,829
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Personal Financial Advisors page for Massachusetts →

Personal Financial Advisors

Connecticut

Median salary
$129,720
Mean salary
$160,780
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$125,200
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Personal Financial Advisors page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into personal financial advisors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.