Skip to content
uswages .org

Photographers Salary: Salt Lake City-Murray, UT vs Springfield, MA

Photographers earn a median of $60,000 in Salt Lake City-Murray, UT and $60,430 in Springfield, MA. That is a nominal gap of $430 (-0.7%), with Springfield, MA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,000
Salt Lake City-Murray, UT median
$59,484 after COL
$60,430
Springfield, MA median
$62,908 after COL
-0.7%
Nominal gap
Springfield, MA leads
-5.4%
Adjusted gap
Springfield, MA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Springfield, MA pays $430 more per year than Salt Lake City-Murray, UT for photographers, a gap of +0.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Springfield, MA still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,424 of extra purchasing power (+5.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for photographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Photographers

Salt Lake City-Murray, UT

Median salary
$60,000
Mean salary
$55,930
Employment
280
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$59,484
Regional Price Parity
100.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Photographers page for Salt Lake City-Murray, UT →

Photographers

Springfield, MA

Median salary
$60,430
Mean salary
$62,870
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$62,908
Regional Price Parity
96.1%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Photographers page for Springfield, MA →

Related pages

Keep digging into photographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.