Skip to content
uswages .org

Physical Scientists, All Other Salary: Maryland vs Minnesota

Physical Scientists, All Other earn a median of $141,290 in Maryland and $147,890 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $6,600 (-4.5%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$141,290
Maryland median
$134,614 after COL
$147,890
Minnesota median
$149,958 after COL
-4.5%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-10.2%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $6,600 more per year than Maryland for physical scientists, all other, a gap of +4.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,343 of extra purchasing power (+10.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physical scientists, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physical Scientists, All Other

Maryland

Median salary
$141,290
Mean salary
$141,310
Employment
1,810
Location quotient
4.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$134,614
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Scientists, All Other page for Maryland →

Physical Scientists, All Other

Minnesota

Median salary
$147,890
Mean salary
$151,450
Employment
540
Location quotient
1.28
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$149,958
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Scientists, All Other page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into physical scientists, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.