Skip to content
uswages .org

Physical Therapist Assistants Salary: Alaska vs Maryland

Physical Therapist Assistants earn a median of $77,640 in Alaska and $77,670 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $30 (-0.0%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,640
Alaska median
$75,851 after COL
$77,670
Maryland median
$74,000 after COL
-0.0%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
+2.5%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $30 more per year than Alaska for physical therapist assistants, a gap of +0.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alaska actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,850 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physical therapist assistants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physical Therapist Assistants

Alaska

Median salary
$77,640
Mean salary
$77,670
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$75,851
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapist Assistants page for Alaska →

Physical Therapist Assistants

Maryland

Median salary
$77,670
Mean salary
$73,000
Employment
1,430
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$74,000
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapist Assistants page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into physical therapist assistants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.