Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physical Therapists Salary: Alaska vs New Jersey

Physical Therapists earn a median of $108,640 in Alaska and $106,310 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $2,330 (+2.2%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$108,640
Alaska median
$106,136 after COL
$106,310
New Jersey median
$97,707 after COL
+2.2%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
+8.6%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $2,330 more per year than New Jersey for physical therapists, a gap of +2.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,429 of extra purchasing power (+8.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physical therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physical Therapists

Alaska

Median salary
$108,640
Mean salary
$113,190
Employment
600
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$106,136
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for Alaska →

Physical Therapists

New Jersey

Median salary
$106,310
Mean salary
$109,470
Employment
7,760
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$97,707
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into physical therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.