Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physical Therapists Salary: Maryland vs Connecticut

Physical Therapists earn a median of $104,330 in Maryland and $103,720 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $610 (+0.6%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$104,330
Maryland median
$99,401 after COL
$103,720
Connecticut median
$100,106 after COL
+0.6%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-0.7%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $610 more per year than Connecticut for physical therapists, a gap of +0.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Connecticut actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $705 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physical therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physical Therapists

Maryland

Median salary
$104,330
Mean salary
$107,690
Employment
4,420
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$99,401
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for Maryland →

Physical Therapists

Connecticut

Median salary
$103,720
Mean salary
$102,420
Employment
4,310
Location quotient
1.59
Jobs per 1,000
2.6
COL-adjusted median
$100,106
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into physical therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.