Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Physical Therapists Salary: Michigan vs Nevada

Physical Therapists earn a median of $98,960 in Michigan and $105,170 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $6,210 (-5.9%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$98,960
Michigan median
$102,851 after COL
$105,170
Nevada median
$105,192 after COL
-5.9%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-2.2%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $6,210 more per year than Michigan for physical therapists, a gap of +5.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,341 of extra purchasing power (+2.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for physical therapists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Physical Therapists

Michigan

Median salary
$98,960
Mean salary
$96,840
Employment
7,800
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$102,851
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for Michigan →

Physical Therapists

Nevada

Median salary
$105,170
Mean salary
$113,700
Employment
1,670
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$105,192
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Physical Therapists page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into physical therapists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.